
IPFS
Gov. Napolitano Approves Prohibition on Real ID (ARIZONA - Update 06-20-2008)
Written by Ernest Hancock Subject: Police State (But definitely look at what they have in place already...
For Immediate
Release
Contact: Senator Karen S. Johnson
(602-926-3160)
Gov. Napolitano Approves Prohibition on
Real ID
Arizona
Governor Janet Napolitano signed a bill today that prohibits the implementation
of the REAL ID in Arizona. SB2677 received a Final vote of approval in
the House last week by an overwhelming margin of 51 to 1. Napolitano’s signature was uncertain until
today when she signed the bill into law.
The bill
prohibits implementation of the REAL ID Act of 2005, which was passed by Congress
as part of a supplemental spending bill for tsunami relief and the War on
Terror. The bill did not receive a
hearing in either the House or the Senate, and the public was largely unaware
of it until it had already been signed into law.
“Everyone
thinks that the REAL ID is just about protecting us against terrorism,” said
co-sponsor Senator Karen Johnson
(R-18). “But it really represents a cash
cow for technology companies as well as the birth of the National ID card,
complete with all the biometric information that technology can handle – face
recognition, fingerprints, etc.”

“Corporations which specialize in
selling identity cards stand to gain millions of dollars in profits if the Real
ID Act is implemented,” said Johnson,
“so, of course, they’re eager for everyone to be required to carry a National
ID card everywhere they go.” Two of
those corporations are Digimarc ID Systems and L-1 – the Number 1 and Number 2
companies for the manufacture of state driver’s licenses and identity cards. L-1 is considered the main driver behind the
REAL ID and last year had nearly $100 million in federal contracts involving
identity cards. Digimarc spent $350,000
in the first six months of 2007 lobbying Congress on the Real ID Act. Apparently the two companies are soon to be
merged, resulting in a powerhouse corporation, pushing the
“identification-as-security” concept to the maximum in order to increase
company profits as they add more and more biometric features to state driver’s
licenses.
“It’s misguided
to think that identification equals security,” says Johnson. “Identification is just identification – it
doesn’t prove intent and it doesn’t stop terrorists. Indeed, terrorists will forge documents – as
they always have – to obtain the identification they want to commit
crimes. Making U.S. citizens
carry identity papers to board a plane or enter a government building stinks,”
says Johnson. “It’s odious, onerous, and a violation of our
civil liberties.”

“I refuse
to be tagged and numbered,” said Johnson. “Requiring people to carry papers takes away
their freedom. There are other, better
ways to stop terrorism and to protect us against criminals. The federal government needs to butt out and
let the states handle driver licensing. It’s
not the business of the Dept. of Homeland Security to tell us how to run our
state.”
Real ID – SB2677
1.
Proponents always claim that the sole purpose of the
Real ID is to prevent another 9/11-type attack by disrupting terrorists
travel. That is bogus. If the government really wanted to
prevent such an attack, they would secure our borders, which would (1) cost less
than implementing Real ID, (2) would be more effective at keeping
terrorists out, and (3) would be less intrusive and less inconvenient
for American citizens. Until the borders
are secure, all the rosy pleas for the Real ID are just so much hogwash.
2.
The Real ID will cost
the states billions of dollars.
The Dept. of Transportation estimates that in Arizona
alone, it will cost $40 to $70 million to implement just in the first year, and
$15 to $20 million in subsequent years.
But they really don’t have a clue – they don’t know what the regulations
are going to be yet. They are just
estimating. It will depend on what the
Rules say when they are finally issued.
They already do some things that
will be part of the requirements. For
example, they already check citizenship, or whether or not someone is legally
authorized to be in the country. So that
would not be an additional expense. But
even factoring in that some things required by REAL ID are already being
handled, the $40 to $70 million is over and above what we already do!!!
3.
The Real ID is an invasion
of privacy. Why should so much
personal information be compiled on one place for so many people to have access
to?
-
medical history
-
social security number
-
insurance information
4.
The Real ID increases
the risk of Identity Theft.
Identity theft is a major problem in Arizona
already. Throwing everyone’s personal
information – including social security numbers, birth dates, medical
information, driver’s license and auto licensing information, etc. – into one
massive data base just makes it easier for identity thieves to harvest
identities for fraudulent purposes. The
Real ID requires all Arizona
driver’s license information to be compiled with all the information for the
other 49 states and the District of
Columbia into one massive database that will be
accessible by thousands of clerks and government employees throughout the
country. This is a horrendous idea – an
invitation to identity theft on a massive scale.

1 Comments in Response to Gov. Napolitano Approves Prohibition on Real ID (ARIZONA - Update 06-20-2008)
http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1187969723463.shtm
http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1197041144284.shtm
The WHTI standards incorporate the real id standards and are MORE STRINGENT than the REAL ID standards.
Again, this is NOT a win. This is political cover. If we communicate it as a win it WILL BE A LOSS as we will still get the REAL ID here in AZ but people wont know it.