WAR AS AN OPTION ??? Even the most myopic rational observer is beginning to realize the federal government consistently distorts reality in every public utterance, all in the quest of total domination of society. ... The Invasion of our Borders and the imposed national corruption of our Republic is virtually beyond the ability of one man, even Trump, to correct. Trump needs more support than from individuals or a federal government that supports the Invasion and Constitutional disorder. ... State legislators/governors who see our borders as an "actually invaded or in imminent Danger" situation have an option of a Declaration of War. Ref: Article I, Section 10, clause 3. They apparently can activate National Guard units, put machine gun nests on location with night vision and drone surveillance, with instructions or remote control/programmed digital control, and use lethal force for any territorial violators. The causalities, after the initial confrontation, would be far less than from fentanyl and rape. Temporary apprehensions at airports, if allowed to land, would dream for retention, and food, as nice as J6er's receive. ... A declaration of WAR would appear to establish martial law and suspends access to civil due process. It is also assumed to suspend federal authority. Ref: Amendments IX, X. ... Invaders who have occupied residences could possibly face National Guard SWAT team elimination. ... Martial law applied to the invasion's use to corrupt voting could expedite correction. Garland has even informed the public that Russia, a foreign invader, will be blamed for Trump's winning to void Trump's election. States must work to secure valid elections throughout the state. ... The invasion's infringement on Free Speech is a companion and result of the Invasion and is subject to State prevention. Declarations of Truth, issued by a coalition of States, are more difficult for a corrupted media to distort. ... Seizure of assets by government via CBDC appear to be manifestations of invasion and subject to martial law prevention. Failure to do so would appear to violate Amendment XIII. ... It is further possible such State legislators could consider examining the authorization of officers stationed at any military installation within their jurisdiction. Any officer that cannot evidence a State approved identification as an officer would be given 24 hours to abandon the territory of the State or face a charge of impersonating a federal officer pursuant to Article I, Section 8, clause 16. A Standing Army is an essential tool of a tyrant and is Constitutionally forbidden. Clause 12. ... Does the above appear to be the only realistic course of action for the States ??